吴丹妮;

• 1:惠州学院外国语学院

摘要(Abstract)：

西方儿童文学研究一直密切关注儿童文本中的成人—儿童权力关系。以杰奎琳·罗斯等代表的学者,揭示了成人意识形态如何建构了内在的儿童形象,从而操控文本外的儿童读者。玛丽亚·尼古拉耶娃提出的"成人规范",则为儿童文学中的权力批评提供了一种新的理论视角,是西方儿童文学建构话语的强调和重申。而当代儿童文学批评又逐渐从这种二元对立解读关系中脱离出来,出现了诸如"亲属模式"等更多元化的声音。通过对西方儿童文学权力批评的梳理可以看出,当代儿童文学批评超越了单一的建构话语批评,走向更加开放、多元的解读模式。

关键词(KeyWords)： 儿童文学;权力关系;成人建构;成人规范

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 吴丹妮;

Email:

DOI: 10.16778/j.cnki.1671-5934.2021.01.012

参考文献(References)：

• [1]TOWNSEND J R. Standards of Criticism for Children's Literature[M]Nancy Chambers. The Signal Approach to Children's Books. New York:Scarecrow,1980.
• [2]佩里·诺德曼.隐藏的成人：定义儿童文学[M].徐文丽，译.北京：中国社会科学出版社，2014.
• [3]ROSE J. The Case of Peter Pan,or the Impossibility of Children's Fiction[M]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,1984.
• [4]约翰·史蒂芬斯.儿童小说中的语言与意识形态[M].合肥：安徽少年儿童出版社，2010.
• [5]HUNT P. Literature For Children:Contemporary Criticism[M]. London:Routledge,1992.
• [6]彼得·亨特.理解儿童文学[M].上海：少年儿童出版社，2010.
• [7]ZORNADO J L. Inventing the Child:Culture,Ideology,and the Story of Childhood[M]. New York:Routledge,2006.
• [8]NODELMAN P. The Other:Orientalism,Colonialism,and Children's Literature[J]. Children's Literature Association Quarterly,1992,17(1):29-35.
• [9]HUNT P. Children's Literature[M]. New York:Routledge,2006.
• [10]MCGILLIS R. The Delights of Impossibility:No Children,No Books,Only Theory[J]. Children's Literature Association Quarterly,1998,23(4):202-208.
• [11]NIKOLAJEVA M. Power,Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers[M]. New York:Routledge,2010.
• [12]COATS K. Book Review:Power,Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers[J]. Children's Literature Association,2011,36(3):338-341.
• [13]BEAUVAIS C. The Mighty Child:Time and power in children's literature[M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2015.
• [14]戴维·拉德.理论的建立与理论：儿童文学该如何生存[M]彼得·亨特.理解儿童文学.上海：少年儿童出版社，2010.
• [15]GUBAR M. Risky Business:Talking about Children in Children's Literature Criticism[J]. Children's Literature Association Quarterly,2013,38(4):450-457.
• [16]BEAUVAIS C. The Problem of“Power”:Metacritical Implications of Aetonormativity for Children's Literature Research[J].Children's Literature in Education,2013,44:74-86.
• [17]JESSICA S.“Youth theory”:a response to aetonormativity[J]. Text,2015,32:1-17.
• [18]KOLODNY A. Dancing through the Minefield:Some Observations on the Theory,Practice and Politics of a Feminist Literary Criticism[J]. Feminist Studies,1980,6(1):1-25.